The Real Effects of FitnessWHEN I excluded proportion and fitness from any share in beauty,
I did not by any means intend to say that they were of no value,
or that
they ought to be disregarded in works of art. Works of art are
the proper sphere of their power; and here it is that they have their
full effect. Whenever the wisdom of our Creator intended that we
should
be affected with anything, he did not confide the execution of
his design to the languid and precarious operation of our reason; but
he
enduced it with powers and properties that prevent the understanding,
and even the will; which, seizing upon the senses and imagination,
captivate the soul before the understanding is ready either to
join
with them, or to oppose them. It is by a long deduction, and much
study, that we discover the adorable wisdom of God in his works:
when we discover
it, the effect is very different, not only in the manner of acquiring
it, but in its own nature, from that which strikes us without any
preparation from the sublime or the beautiful. How different is the
satisfaction
of an anatomist, who discovers the use of the muscles and of the
skin, the excellent contrivance of the one for the various movements
of the
body, and the wonderful texture of the other, at once a general
covering, and at once a general outlet as well as inlet; how different
is this
from the affection which possesses an ordinary man at the sight
of a delicate, smooth skin, and all the other parts of beauty, which
require no investigation to be perceived! In the former case, whilst
we look
up to the Maker with admiration and praise, the object which causes
it may be odious and distasteful; the latter very often so touches
us by its power on the imagination, that we examine but little
into
the artifice of its contrivance; and we have need of a strong effort
of our reason to disentangle our minds from the allurements of
the object, to a consideration of that wisdom which invented so powerful
a machine. The effect of proportion and fitness, at least so far
as they proceed from a mere consideration of the work itself, produces
approbation, the acquiescence of the understanding, but not love,
nor
any passion of that species. When we examine the structure of a
watch,
when we come to know thoroughly the use of every part of it, satisfied
as we are with the fitness of the whole, we are far enough from
perceiving anything like beauty in the watchwork itself; but let us
look on
the case, the labour of some curious artist in engraving, with little
or
no idea of use, we shall have a much livelier idea of beauty than
we ever could have had from the watch itself, though the master-piece
of Graham. In beauty, as I said, the effect is previous to any
knowledge of the use; but to judge of proportion, we must know the
end for
which
any work is designed. According to the end, the proportion varies.
Thus there is one proportion of a tower, another of a house; one
proportion of a gallery, another of a hall, another of a chamber.
To judge of
the proportions of these, you must be first acquainted with the
purposes for which they were designed. Good sense and experience, acting
together,
find out what is fit to be done in every work of art. We are rational
creatures, and in all our works we ought to regard their end and
purpose; the gratification of any passion, how innocent soever, ought
only to
be of a secondary consideration. Herein is placed the real power
of fitness and proportion; they operate on the understanding considering
them, which approves the work and acquiesces in it. The passions,
and
the imagination which principally raises them, have here very little
to do. When a room appears in its original nakedness, bare walls
and a plain ceiling; let its proportion be ever so excellent, it
pleases very little; a cold approbation is the utmost we can reach;
a much
worse proportioned room with elegant mouldings and fine festoons,
glasses,
and other merely ornamental furniture, will make the imagination
revolt against the reason; it will please much more than the naked
proportion
of the first room, which the understanding has so much approved
as admirably fitted for its purposes. What I have here said and
before
concerning proportion, is by no means to persuade people absurdly
to neglect the idea of use in the works of art. It is only to show
that
these excellent things, beauty and proportion, are not the same;
not that they should either of them be disregarded. |
<BACK |